Realbasic Serial Communication Linux

This is an of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the.This article is nothing more than product shilling by people who do not even follow their own rules:Actions of these shills:1. You remove screnshots others have uploaded, but then object to the fact people are removing your uploaded screenshots which are NOT linked to articles articles verifying the screenshots.And top further shill this product you include multiple screenshots of this product on multiple operating systems as a way to sell this product instead of following Wiki regulations which say you should only use multiple os screenshots when there is a significant difference between the product on each.

The purpose of the new IDE was so RB looks the same on all platforms, thus you ar enothing but shills.To further illustrate this point you remove historical screenshots of previous IDE's of RB from the article, even ones linked to outside articles, and accorrding to Wiki guidelines mutliple screenshots of previous IDE's is justified because the product looked and acted completely different on different operating systems prior to the new IDE in RB2005.2. You remove information as being controversial as opposed to neutral yet you link to articles which have their own 'con', 'controversial', and the like sections.3. You remove any historical information about the redesign of this product and the removal of features with the introduction of RB2005. Lets see here a product is originally made for the Macintosh platform only, uses a Macintosh interface for the vast majority of its life, and thats not historical information. No you only want to provide free advertising to Real Software instead. The redeign of the product is a historical fact and people have the right to know exactly what they buying and what they no longer can do. Neutral means a balance of + and -, not all +, unless of course if you are nothing but product shillers.4.

You remove a complete set of instructions that any RB user can duplicate for testing for the problem of increased application sizes in RB as RB is updated under the grounds it would be too much of a burden on users to download RB and try it, yet on the other hand you provide code samples which are linked to outside articles, but which you say users can duplicate for themeselves - just how are they are suppose to do that without downloading Realbasic in the same manner.5. You continually post information highlighting the supposed features of this product, yet provide no links to articles from independent sources to back this up. Instead you say RB has this and that feature and then just link to a generic subject on Wiki. Yet on the other hand you remove other people's work for the same reason.You continually remove other people's work, but object when people remove your work for the same reason. For this reason this article should be removed from Wikipedia as its nothing more than product shilling for RS, instead of a HISTORICAL GUIDELINE TO THE REALBASIC PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE. You do know Realbasic is programming language - not just the latest versions of the IDE for sale over at RS.Your destructive changes are being reverted by a wide variety of Wikipedia editors who have likely never used (or even heard of) REALBasic, myself included.

You have been classified as a vandal for your behaviour here, not because of your opinion. You have been told this repeatedly, you have been warned repeatedly, you have had multiple accounts banned from Wikipedia for this destructive vandalistic behaviour, and yet you carry on with the blah blah blah. Don't you get it? YOU ARE IN THE WRONG HERE. Nobody is going to give a sh- about your stance on the subject matter if the sum total of your contribution is destructive vandalism. There are over one million articles on Wikipedia, can't you find something productive to contribute to this project? Wikipedia is, first, foremost, and solely an encyclopedia.

It is a platform for advocacy of any kind. You know this and yet you wilfully ignore it.

You have absolutely no chance of winning any kind of concession with this kind of destructive behaviour. Edit constructively, or don't edit at all. 04:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC). Contents.Verify or Remove ArticleOnce again we see the article has been reverted to a ad campaign for Real Software full unverified information.

Realbasic Serial Communication Linux Code

Instead of verifying information the RB product shills continue to use deceitful tactics such as this example under “Language Features”:“RB is a strongly typed language with minimal automatic type conversion, that supports single inheritance and multiple interfaces, class methods and class properties, reference counting (similar to Java), definition of customized arithmetic operators (similar to C).